01
Led resolution
Your Name runs the 8D on one open issue, from the sister turbines through a report the other party can answer.
Wind energy
Your Name runs 8D problem solving for field failures on wind turbines and their gearboxes, bearings, blades, pitch systems, and converters. For an owner, an OEM, or a supplier.
Which turbines to stop, inspect, or keep running, and which sister turbines are in the population.
Why the defect was made, and why it escaped. A file that names only one of them is not finished.
The action is in place, or the file states the later date a crane, a weather window, or a teardown requires.
Who the file is for
Several turbines of one type have failed. The rest of the fleet still needs a decision: stop, inspect, or keep running.
A field complaint needs containment, and an 8D the owner can answer.
A component has come back, the customer clock is running, and the installed fleet is not yet defined.
A led resolution does not require the software. Each case states whether the work is for the owner, the OEM, or the supplier. A named person accepts the root cause.
01
Your Name runs the 8D on one open issue, from the sister turbines through a report the other party can answer.
02
Resolution software for the team that will run the file itself. It drafts the problem statement, an Is / Is-not, and a 5-Why. It flags a missing escape cause, a missing sister population, a missing clean point, or a close with no evidence. Use is a pilot. The software does not accept the root cause.
The same eight disciplines for a led resolution and for [Product name].
Where a crane, a weather window, or a teardown sets a later date, the report states that date and the reason.
Name the people who can describe the failure, the process, and the escape path.
State the failure on the component and the turbine type: what is seen, where, since when, and how many.
Decide which turbines to stop, inspect, or keep running. Define the sister population by serial number, batch, build date, site, and operating hours.
Separate why the defect was made from why it escaped. A named person accepts both causes.
Choose the action that removes those causes, and record what was considered and set aside.
Put the action in place and show that it worked. If the hardware date is later, the file says so.
Change the check that let the defect escape, so the next batch and the next site do not repeat it.
Close on evidence. Recognize the people who did the work. A close with no evidence stays open.
No case is published yet. One is added only when it can be named.